Peer-reviewed studies are being done on whether mRNA vaccine decreases sperm count and total mobile count

BY SIMONE J. SMITH

There is a plethora of reasons as to why people have been hesitant to take the COVID-19 vaccinations; one reason is because of news circulating on the internet about how it can affect fertility.

Research has been done on this topic, and we want to provide you with two sides of this discussion. In a research study titled, “Sperm Parameters Before and After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” (June 17^th, 2021) it was recorded that reproductive toxicity was not evaluated in the clinical trials. In their research, they assessed sperm parameters before and after mRNA vaccine administration.

They found that there were no significant decreases in any sperm parameter among the small cohort of healthy men. While these results showed statistically significant increases in all sperm parameters, the increase may be due to the increased abstinence time before the second sample.

There were limitations with this study: the small number of men enrolled; limited generalizability beyond young, healthy men; short follow-up; and lack of a control group. In addition, while semen analysis is the foundation of male fertility evaluation, it is an imperfect predictor of fertility potential.

There is more being said about this topic especially following reports that showed the mRNA vaccines had caused excess miscarriages in rats, as well as other reports proving that measurable amounts of vaccine reached the ovaries and testes in rodents.

Mainstream media “fact checkers” and public health authorities have dismissed these concerns, but there is new research that has come to light that must be addressed.

There is a peer-reviewed study that cuts to the heart of the question; are there hidden fertility risks, and if so, why have the authorities worked so hard to convince us they are safe?

The Israeli paper offers hard evidence that the vaccines may present a systemic risk to men’s sperm counts. This was a significant and unforeseen impact not only missed in the rush-job drug trials, but that the drug makers assured us was basically impossible.

Now, this effect looks durable to at least six months and from the data, and the role of boosters here is not known. Even if this condition does moderate and sperm levels return to prior levels over time, that time scale looks quite long. It’s certainly more than six months. What does it mean for men who continue to take boosters?

The authors qualified their findings by reporting that after five months, sperm levels recovered. Thus the decreases were only temporary. Put aside the fact that a five-month decrease hardly qualifies as temporary for someone trying to start a family

Researchers and scientists have their work cut out for them. Further studies are needed to validate and expand upon current findings.